Security Interests v. Royalty Interests

April 18, 2018
  1. Under Louisiana law, while “fugitive minerals” cannot be conveyed, “this principle by no means forbids a landowner or lessee from conveying pre-extraction mineral interests”;
  2. An “overriding royalty interest” is a property interest, not “a mere interest in proceeds” from production; and
  3. The “safe harbor” provision in the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act protected a party’s liens on a debtor’s overriding royalty interests – while that statute “may not be a model of clarity,” its reference to “hydrocarbons” includes such interests, when viewed in the complete context of the Louisiana property statutes.

OHA Investment Corp. v. Schlumberger Tech. Corp., No. 17-20224 (April 17, 2018).

Follow by Email
Twitter
Follow Me