Earlier this year, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a fee enhancement in the Pilgrim’s Pride bankruptcy pursuant to section 330 of the Code. In ASARCO LLC v. Barclays Capital, the Court reversed an enhancement under section 328. No. 11-41010 (Dec. 11, 2012). “Section 328 applies when the bankruptcy court approves a particular rate . . . at the outset of the engagement, and § 330 applies when the court does not do so.” Id. at 13. A “necessary prerequisite” to section 328 enhancement is that the professional’s work was “not capable of anticipation.” Here, the Court found that the length of the ASARCO bankruptcy and the exodus of its employees after filing led to “commendable” work by Barclays that was still “capable of being anticipated.” See id. at 19 (analogizing Barclays to a car buyer who finds a new Corvette “needed far more than a car wash”).
Recent Related Posts