Venable had a heart attack on a drilling barge; he and its owner agreed to settle for $350,000. The Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Corporation initially indicated its agreement, but withdrew consent when it became evident that he would need a heart transplant. Venable v. Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Corporation, No. 12-30965 (Dec. 30, 2013). Litigation ensued as to whether the LWCC could rely upon section 933 of LHWCA, which gives a carrier such as LWCC a veto right with substantial procedural safeguards. The Fifth Circuit reversed summary judgment for Venable. After a thorough and succinct review of the black-letter law on federal question jurisdiction, the Court found that section 933 gave the LWCC a defensive right that did not implicate Venable’s “well-pleaded complaint.” It also found that the tentative nature of the LWCC’s alleged consent foreclosed ancillary jurisdiction over the claimed settlement under Kokonnen v. Guardian Life, 511 U.S. 375 (1994).
Recent Related Posts