The defendant in Innovation First Int’l v. Zuru Inc. removed a trade secret case about a toy robotic fish and then obtained dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds. No. 12-10511 (Feb. 19, 2013, unpublished). The Fifth Circuit found no abuse of discretion in the district court’s conclusions that the design and production of the fish took place in China and that the bulk of witnesses and evidence were in China, and affirmed based on the analogous case of Dickson Marine v. Panalpina, Inc., 179 F.3d 331 (5th Cir. 1999). A revised opinion slightly changed the Court’s analysis of the deference due to the plaintiff’s choice of forum.
Recent Related Posts