An expert opined that a railroad crossing was unsafe and required active warning devices. Brown v. Illinois Central Railroad, No. 11-60654 (Jan. 28, 2013). He contended that the crossing had “‘narrow’ pavement, ‘skewed’ angle, ‘rough’ surface and ‘steep’ incline” but did not tie those conclusions to a guideline or publications, relying instead on “education and experience.” He also admitted that visibility at the crossing was adequate under the Transportation Department’s standards. Id. at 7. Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s exclusion of his testimony under Daubert, calling it “transparently subjective.” Id. at 8.
Recent Related Posts